yes, i had an emcs with ds, followed by an elcs with dd...i didn't ahve to fight 'too hard' but i did have to be fairly firm...i think my error there though was that had been considering vbac, so once i mentioned that they were pushing me for vbac, when i got to 36+5 it hit me that i was petrified of a vbac and me and my consulaltnt had a couple of meetings and at 38+5 we compromised that i could be booked in for cs at 40weeks and if i went into sponatneous labour beforehand that i would try vbac ...i had my cs at 40+4, he did agree that if i hadn't shown an interest in vbac at all that it would've been 39weeks, very few questions asked etc...having had a previous cs is in itself a medical reason for an elcs, so not sure what that's about...if they do get funny u can simply bring up scar rupture, a small, but very real risk, which if they forced u into a vbac after u had stated u wanted an elcs and then this were to happen the hospital could be held accountable, so u do have a medical reason, it's ur birth, and ur body, and they can't force u into a vbac...i know next time if i say from the start elcs then they won't be arguing, it's only cos i ummed and ahhed until right near the end as i still wasn't 100% which way i wanted to go, and at booking i had been very pro vbac, so my own 'fault' really...hth x
Austin 21/3/09 Phoebe 13/12/10