Tue 24 Nov 2009 | You are here: Home > chatroom > Chatroom essentials > Chat room rules > Moved -- Are second labours faster?
Join Photobox
There is a problem with your Flash Player.
left col

Jordan/Katie Price exiting 'I'm a Celebrity'?


Disclaimer

The material contained on these pages is in no way intended to replace professional medical care or advice and should not be used as a basis for diagnosis or choice of treatment. Answers to specific problems may not apply to everyone. If you're worried, see your GP.


Moved -- Are second labours faster?

Forum Jump
Author Message
Joined : Oct 22, 2006
Posts : 6
Rank: Newbie

My Other Topics
Posted : Mar 31, 2008 4:03:46 PM
Subject : Moved -- Are second labours faster?

1277

Back to top
Cici_Ying

Cici_Ying
Joined : Mar 17, 2008
Posts : 53
Rank: Regular

My Other Topics
Posted : Apr 10, 2008 1:16:45 AM

yes, the first time it took 20 hours in total from the first contraction to birth
2nd time round, it took 4 hours and even that was considered slow according to other mums

Back to top
nikki84

nikki84
Joined : Aug 14, 2007
Posts : 439
Rank: Star user

My Other Topics
Posted : Apr 14, 2008 10:56:39 PM

my first labour was over 48hours long from first contraction to birth and second was under a hour from 1st contraction to birth.

Back to top
sarahsj
Joined : Apr 03, 2008
Posts : 10
Rank: Newbie

My Other Topics
Posted : Apr 24, 2008 9:35:49 PM

yes my first child i was in labour for 5hrs my second was 1hr and my third was 4hrs

Back to top


Who's online?

1boy1girlnbeanie | Angel Cake | Broodypants | emilunia | fairyelephant82 | ILOVEMYGEEK2 | Judi_c5 | Miss Impatient | MrsSetters | Poppy83 | sarah-jb | Sugar*Plum*Fairy | vickic | xx Mims xx | xxMrs Txx |



Board statistics

We have 88540 discussion board members

Welcome to our latest member fairyelephant82

In total there are 172 active users online, 15 members and 157 guests

CONTACT | FAQ | PRIVACY | TERMS & CONDITIONS | ADVERTISERS | TOP
The National Magazine Company Ltd. © Copyright 2008